Average Bench: 83.2% (143rd of 848)

Based on 5,775 user benchmarks.  Models: KINGSTON SHSS37A240G, KINGSTON SHSS37A, KINGSTON KINGSTON SHSS37A, KINGSTON SHSS37A240G

The 240GB Kingston HyperX Savage sports a Phison PS3110 controller. This marks a welcome departure from Kingston's use of Sandforce 2281 controllers and for the first time in years gives Kinston a shot at competing in the enthusiast/performance segment of the SSD market. Comparing the HyperX Savage and Fury shows that the new Phision controller has an effective speed that is around 40% faster than the Sandforce based Fury. But then comparing the similarly priced OCZ Vertex 460a and Savage shows that, although the overall effective speeds are similar, the Vertex has three times faster 4K Mixed IO speeds. The HyperX Savage is very good for typical consumer use but power users with more demanding I/O loads should probably look elsewhere. [Jun '15 SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Very good average bench

The HyperX Savage 240GB averaged just 16.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the HyperX Savage 240GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 4K Random Write Speed 76.9MB/s
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 25.7MB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the HyperX Savage 240GB is 44.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the HyperX Savage 240GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 18.8MB/s
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 12.6MB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,775 samples)
Min Avg Max
376 Read 499 526
246 Write 442 509
267 Mixed 462 512
104% 468 MB/s
Min Avg Max
16.7 4K Read 25.7 32.2
30.3 4K Write 76.9 115
9.87 4K Mixed 12.6 14.1
95.7% 38.4 MB/s
Min Avg Max
21.9 DQ Read 179 350
54.5 DQ Write 217 349
10.1 DQ Mixed 18.8 61.5
64% 138 MB/s
User Benchmarks Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
The fastest SSD (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
104GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 500
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 10.6
72% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 9.92
56% 118 MB/s
149GB free
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Read 496
Write 455
Mixed 486
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 9.79
62% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 58.6
37% 40.2 MB/s
5,775 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 2,574,185 SSDs tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $114.991 day ago.
NeweggUS $114.9920 days ago.
EbayUS $133.051 day ago.
Send price feedback
Typical Savage 240GB Builds (Compare 12,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,024

Popular Savage 240GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2017 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our consumer SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed based on real world performance then adjust by cost per GB to yield a value for money rating. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. Share your opinion by voting. [SSDrivePro]

 Comments

Controller: Phison PS3110. NAND Memory: Toshiba A19 MLC

Extreme performance for the 
extreme performer....

Added 22 months ago.

Good

22 months ago.


Poor

1 day ago.

reliability


Good

19 hrs ago.

Overall a decent performer compared to my Samsung 840 SSD although I'm far from impressed with the HyperX boot speeds and even disappointed with Kingston for not offering or even releasing additional software for the HyperX Savage...


Poor

1 month ago.

RapidX lagi laju daripada ni.


Your
opinion?
▲Like   ▼Dislike

You have viewed 97 pages, please contribute.


848 Drives (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different SSDs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $106
Intel Pentium G4560 $60AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $229Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $219Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $170
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $115SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback