Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 months ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '18 at 16:41
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770K-$471
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.4% Very good
SC Int 105
SC Float 108
SC Mixed 107
86% 107 Pts
QC Int 376
QC Float 391
QC Mixed 375
86% 381 Pts
MC Int 549
MC Float 546
MC Mixed 557
83% 551 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780 Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67% Good
Lighting 186
Reflection 160
Parallax 254
65% 200 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 204
Splatting 105
68% 155 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67%
Great: 81%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Volume0 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 184 207 218 184 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 407
Write 457
Mixed 246
SusWrite 195
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 26.3
96% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 179
147% 216 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$253
58GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 345 330 272 222 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 362
Write 360
Mixed 338
SusWrite 270
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 42.4
137% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 196
137% 175 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 133%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
193GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 180 181 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 121
SusWrite 180
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.9
371% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
431GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 159 159 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 152
Mixed 109
SusWrite 159
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.8
372% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95%
Great: 115%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 128GB-$80
91GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 29
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 28.2
40% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 21.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 136%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,264
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $114
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback