Acer AT110 F2

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer AT110 F2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer AT110 F2
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '18 at 02:43
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 170 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 333 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.02% Terrible	Lighting 4.93 Reflection 7.12 Parallax 1.66 4% 4.57 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 4.48 4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 268 269 266 262 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 352 Write 346 Mixed 311 SusWrite 260 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 35.4 116% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 228 173% 234 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 124%
PRETEC-P6000-SSD-120GB 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 112GB free Firmware: 501ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 93 101 105 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.2% Average	Read 148 Write 127 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 93.3 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 25.2 89% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 112 89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 45%
WD WD10EADS-00M2B0 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 399GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 136 136 137 136 135 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 134 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 387GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 70 69 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 32.1 Mixed 36.9 SusWrite 69.1 37% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MLK72V3N Hynix HMT351U7BFR8A-H9 TS512MLK72V3N Hynix HMT351U7BFR8A-H9 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AT110 F2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer AT110 F2

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples	1x
Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	1x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

SSD
LDLC 120GBBench 54%, 1,255 samples	1x
AS350 512GBApacerBench 77%, 5,144 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC72C8PG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 51%, 5 samples	1x
HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 26%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16