Lenovo 11412RQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 11412RQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 11412RQ
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 16:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 87.2
44% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 159
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21E2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.13
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 36 38 20 44 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 71.1
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 36.5
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H JM1066KSN-2G 10GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback