Medionpc MS-6714

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedionpc MS-6714  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-6714
Memory0.1 GB free of 4.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 19:14
Run Duration1271 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.00GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
Memory 23.7
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 15
13% 18.2 Pts
4-Core 18.2
8-Core 18.8
2% 18.5 Pts
64-Core 21.6
1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA2AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 7.3 7.8 9.1 9.2 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 16.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 8.4
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
256, 256, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
MC Read 0.1
MC Write 1.4
MC Mixed 0
1% 0.5 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0
SC Mixed 0
0% 0 GB/s
Latency 294
14% 294 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback