| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M4A89TD PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120907 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 26 '18 at 13:11 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.5%
Above average
|
51% 76 Pts
|
26% 206 Pts
|
15% 247 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
|
27.5%
Poor
|
26% 32.6 fps
|
30% 37.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ocz-vert EX2 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 53 47 49 53 62 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
19% 86.1 MB/s
|
47% 17.8 MB/s
|
63% 87.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
79GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 91 91 93 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
45% 60.2 MB/s
|
167% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.5%
Below average
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
23% 7.97 GB/s
|
58% 68.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A89TD PRO Builds (Compare 6 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A89TD PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 4x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 1x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples | 1x |
| R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples | 1x |
| HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples | 1x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 1x |
| Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples | 1x |
| AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $204 |