Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 106 54% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 328 33% 269 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1264) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 6.57 Reflection 26 Parallax 6.5 5% 13 fps	MRender 9.33 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 13.7 8% 9.58 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 890GB free (System drive) Firmware: 16.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 124 124 128 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston 9905624-033.A00G 12GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 20 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 18.3 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,892x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,505x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	686x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	827x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	255x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	196x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	600x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	409x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	278x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16