Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 22:41
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 148
59% 99 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 624
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1970) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 58.2
47% 57.7 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 53.1
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 143 148 153 134 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 279
Write 211
Mixed 256
SusWrite 147
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 23.2
74% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 97.9
DQ Mixed 114
97% 146 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 69%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 413 417 409 330 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 404
Write 377
Mixed 322
SusWrite 380
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 27
103% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 249
213% 313 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 39.5
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback