Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 121 56% 90 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 240 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 128 134 125 124 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 280 Write 71.2 Mixed 325 SusWrite 133 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 20.1 91% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 32 63% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 577GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 169 183 194 192 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 158 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 187 104% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.3% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	7x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $298

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16