Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120627
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '15 at 00:03
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 62.5 2-Core 126 43% 94 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 301 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 3122) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Lighting 27.2 Reflection 22 Parallax 23.7 22% 24.3 fps	MRender 20.5 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 27.5 20% 23.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 946 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 133 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9293447039	60% Good	Read 467 Write 280 Mixed 302 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 12.5 70% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 11.9 31% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 118%
SiImage 110GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 74GB free Firmware: 0000 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 290 Write 42.6 Mixed 55.3 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 9.99 53% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 39.5 DQ Mixed 23.8 32% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 135274344 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1291 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 56191007 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6121 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 624 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 73 44 215202922523 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18323 (C2) HDA temperature 27 56 68719476763 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 50848117821685 (F1) Unknown 100 253 30821220341333 (F2) Unknown 100 253 50373669909608	91.2% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 150 Mixed 143 116% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.35 103% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 685GB free, PID 1013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 84.1 Write 91.6 Mixed 73.8 107% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)