Asus GRYPHON Z97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus GRYPHON Z97  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 08:18
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 72%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 80
2-Core 152
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 256
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 61.1
49% 63.6 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 68
Splatting 73
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$142
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 191 207 173 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 338
Write 216
Mixed 247
SusWrite 186
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 24.6
87% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 143
131% 200 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 89%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
479GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 56 64 52 118 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 144
Write 102
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 85.1
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 83%
JMicron Generic 360GB
335GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 205 183 181 182 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 142
Mixed 156
SusWrite 185
234% 180 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 15.3
1,068% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 24.3
1,647% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-025.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GRYPHON Z97 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus GRYPHON Z97 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback