Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111215
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '16 at 20:09
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium B940 3,831 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 75.9 46% 67.9 Pts	4-Core 82.5 8-Core 90.2 11% 86.3 Pts	64-Core 93.9 6% 93.9 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FC90) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2353 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 2 1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fastdisk 30G 30GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20150818 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 29 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 85 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 51 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 5 (A4) Unknown 100 100 82668 (A5) Unknown 100 100 188 (A6) Unknown 100 100 134 (A7) Unknown 100 100 163 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 20 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 771 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10524 (F2) Unknown 100 100 12435 (F5) Unknown 100 100 139585	37.9% Below average	Read 316 Write 75.2 Mixed 104 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 2.62 62% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 87.1 DQ Write 76.6 DQ Mixed 14.3 29% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA MK3275GSX 320GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 60GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 26 Mixed 28.5 36% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.25 61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 02B5 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.9% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16