Lenovo 20CK000XMS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20CK000XMS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20CK000XMS
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180606
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 49
32% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 67.4
9% 67.3 Pts
64-Core 66.4
4% 66.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2223) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4432
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.73
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 5.84
4% 5.14 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 70 66 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 425
Write 126
Mixed 143
SusWrite 66.8
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 15.4
73% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 166
123% 168 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback