ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	ECT A_M_I
Motherboard	Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '16 at 17:28
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 71.6 2-Core 145 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 427 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.6% Excellent	Lighting 97.7 Reflection 121 Parallax 102 80% 107 fps	MRender 99.9 Gravity 100 Splatting 102 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc12 0G1CS1754D117-55 120GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 417 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 496 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 6 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 11196 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 41 (E7) Temperature 100 100 36 (E9) Unknown 0 0 0 (EA) Unknown 0 0 31 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1841 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3796	50.3% Above average	Read 393 Write 226 Mixed 225 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 8.39 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 12.2 34% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 60.9 90% 169 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 533GB free Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 3 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896829623 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 527 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2847 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 490 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 531 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 531 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 158914576415 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85.2% Excellent	Read 156 Write 141 Mixed 144 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.22 86% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3 1x8GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback