Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus Z9PA-D8 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory	4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130726
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 07:28
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 551 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 158 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 615 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 2,016 125% 2,016 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3755) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.6% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 117 Parallax 114 88% 113 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 103 Splatting 81 85% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 468GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 415 416 418 414 413 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 404 Mixed 327 SusWrite 416 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 74 4K Mixed 36.9 130% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 218 172% 239 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS726060ALA640 6TB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 3.5TB free Firmware: AHGNT1EN SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 155 158 158 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 150 Write 156 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 157 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 101%
Hitachi HUS726060AL 6TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2TB free Firmware: T1EN SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 163 165 165 166 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 156 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 165 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 119%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: A5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 108 117 120 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 131 Write 134 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 114 70% 98 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB 460 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 61GB free Firmware: A5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 71 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 76.7 Write 89.3 Mixed 44 SusWrite 73.1 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS72202 2TB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1.5TB free Firmware: A20N SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 116 113 119 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 124 Write 107 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 116 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4TB free, PID ab28 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 58 58 52 59 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 64 Write 81.5 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 60.9 90% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.9 216% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 56%
WDC WD25 00BJKT-75F4T0 250GB 198GB free, PID 8017 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 64 65 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.8% Poor	Read 53.3 Write 52.8 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 64.5 73% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF25672AZ-1G 18JSF25672AZ-1G 18JSF25672AZ-1G CT25672BA1339.M CT25672BA1339.M CT25672BA1339.M 12GB 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	116% Outstanding	MC Read 63.3 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 43.3 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.8 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
P3-256 256GBBench 69%, 2,367 samples	3x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 8 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH 4x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 15 samples	3x
M393B2G70DB0-YK 2x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16