Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180928
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 03:49
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 242
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 562
62% 487 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 6.75
6% 13 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 15
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 564 260 260 260 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 665
Mixed 616
SusWrite 368
122% 539 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 17.8
65% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 582
470% 661 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 126%
Spcc Sol id State Dis 120GB
89GB free
Firmware: S9FM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 75 76 77 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
Read 351
Write 71.9
Mixed 119
SusWrite 74.4
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 7.9
40% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 23.3
34% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 64%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
892GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 139 140 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 145
Write 137
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback