Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory7.99GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.99GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.3 GB free of 7.99219 GB
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 05:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
CPU 1, 3 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 19.1
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 76.8
24% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 276
27% 223 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 55%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 429GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 108 110 112 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 327
12% 327 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback