Asus M4N68T-M-V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N68T-M-V2 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110126
Uptime	13.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '19 at 15:34
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 46.5 2-Core 93.7 45% 70.8 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 141 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 11 Parallax 12.8 12% 13 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 12.5 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZZ10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 58 Write 55.5 Mixed 39.1 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 41%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 18GB free Firmware: 3.01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 37.5 Write 14.2 Mixed 24.9 19% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 34%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 91GB free Firmware: ZZ10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 45 45 46 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 45.7 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 45.7 33% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 41%
Gb0250c8 045 250GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 106GB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 73.7 Write 5 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 10.1 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 96.5 41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N68T-M-V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M-V2

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	12x
Athlon II X2 255AMDBench 42%, 3,508 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	7x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SS D 128GBNetacBench 56%, 12 samples	3x
SUV400S3712 120GBKingstonBench 34%, 503 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	50x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16