Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 13:36
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 739
72% 593 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
PNY(196E 1133) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 115
Parallax 102
86% 108 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 88.1
76% 94.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 165 162 158 157 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 333
Mixed 324
SusWrite 177
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 57.7
181% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
363GB free
Firmware: A3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 115
Write 115
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 115
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
234GB free
Firmware: 1113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 68.5
Write 87
Mixed 56
SusWrite 88.8
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 62%
WD Re 2TB-$33
108GB free
Firmware: 1D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 76.7
Write 70.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 82.3
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
542GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 182 184 187 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 95.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 183
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
MD15000-ALDW-RO 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 99
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 97.1
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD BLS8G4D240FSA.16FADG CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 63
63% 63 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $755
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback