Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Aspire 1830T (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100820
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 09:09
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium U5400 139 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 56 31% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 55.9 8% 57.5 Pts	64-Core 58.3 4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 040E) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.19% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.19% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB3OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 56 52 48 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 65 Write 61 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 51.3 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 5.8 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
SUPERTALENT02 2x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 1,911 samples	2x
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	1x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	1x

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $45