Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '16 at 00:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 148
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 464
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 32.3
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 34.5
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 492
Write 383
Mixed 401
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 21.6
113% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 21.2
25% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 122
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.42
112% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 166
Write 144
Mixed 136
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.27
111% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback