Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 17:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 492
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.4
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 20.3
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 973GB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 178 184 179 174 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 369
Write 98.6
Mixed 148
SusWrite 172
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 13.8
53% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 146
114% 160 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback