Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9SCL/X9SCM  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SCL/X9SCM
Memory5.4 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 17:38
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 81
45% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 342
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 57 0 45 42 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 57
Mixed 31
SusWrite 33.2
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Winbond 25X/Q Series 8GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SCL/X9SCM Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $74
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback