Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510UF
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 19:44
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	65%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 514 56% 444 Pts	64-Core 532 33% 532 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX130 14,117 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1131) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3648 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	8.54% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 8.59 9% 9.45 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 8.43 8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.54% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB 43,498 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 411 412 421 410 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 407 Write 338 Mixed 212 SusWrite 400 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 16.1 97% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 60.8 DQ Mixed 77.5 61% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 315GB free Firmware: SBFA13.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 147 110 112 110 131 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 246 Write 110 Mixed 215 SusWrite 146 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 16.8 68% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 26.2 33% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 102%
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 128GB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 118GB free Firmware: 3203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.2% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 39.6 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 14.3 7% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 11.5 38% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 13.8 11% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 74%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 259GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 14 14 15 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 41.2 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 14.4 8% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 15.7 51% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 23.7 DQ Mixed 24.5 18% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 89%
Lacie P9227 Slim 2TB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 35 Write 35.8 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 13.9 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.5 154% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ BL 2TB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free Firmware: A905 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 105 105 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 76.8 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 104 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.M16FF 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.8% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook S15 X510UF Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	218x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	196x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	15x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	313x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	116x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	68x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	13x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	11x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	103x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	62x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16