| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 870-152nf (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 828A |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160720 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 17 '19 at 19:27 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.3%
Above average
|
61% 103 Pts
|
35% 273 Pts
|
18% 287 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.8%
Above average
|
52% 59.7 fps
|
52% 63.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 28 116 31 15 30 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
38% 172 MB/s
|
79% 30.6 MB/s
|
113% 181 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
502GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 155 158 156 158 MB/s
|
79.7%
Very good
|
88% 120 MB/s
|
219% 1.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.8%
Poor
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
23% 8.03 GB/s
|
42% 95.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 870-152nf Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-152nf
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $343 |