Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX140 S1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3049-A1
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120206
Uptime	13 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '19 at 15:13
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 162 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 287 37% 281 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI MegaSR 12TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 8.5TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 34 29 28 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.3% Poor	Read 546 Write 23 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 30 34% 161 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 10% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 46%
LSI MegaSR 119GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 39 30 28 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.3% Poor	Read 52 Write 38.2 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 32.4 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.3 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16