Lenovo 4157HL3

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4157HL3 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110523
Uptime	8.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '16 at 22:12
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 155 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 400 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 373.6 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.1% Average	Lighting 55 Reflection 46.7 Parallax 61.4 45% 54.4 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 62.4 Splatting 45 46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Inte SSDSA2M160G2GC 160GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 42070 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 81 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 540921 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 95 95 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	36.6% Below average	Read 254 Write 97.7 Mixed 140 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 5.67 57% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 45 DQ Mixed 37.2 44% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 44%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB 3,334 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 446GB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 110 Write 118 Mixed 110 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.64 133% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 17.1 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4157HL3 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4157HL3

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	2x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	2x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 128GBSanDisk $84Bench 41%, 8,513 samples	2x
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16