Acer TP-W511P-27602G06ASS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TP-W511P-27602G06ASS  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ICONIA W511
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '16 at 13:41
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
U2H1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Memory 33.6
1-Core 7.4
2-Core 13.7
14% 18.2 Pts
4-Core 20
8-Core 21.6
3% 20.8 Pts
64-Core 25.5
2% 25.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Acer(1025 074B)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1176
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.68 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MCG8GC 63GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.3
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 78.5
Write 45.7
Mixed 58.2
14% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.93
4K Write 8.93
4K Mixed 3.79
23% 7.22 MB/s
DQ Read 9.44
DQ Write 9.58
DQ Mixed 3.77
4% 7.59 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 23%
Generic SA16G SD Card 16GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1.1
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 4.34
Mixed 6.4
8% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.57
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.12
120% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung JM800QSU-2G 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback