PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Maximus II Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100415 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 10 '20 at 19:03 |
Run Duration | 263 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
41%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 63 76 100 102 105 MB/s
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
Intel 330 Series 180GB
167GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 82 96 98 104 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
266GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 84 103 108 105 115 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
310GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 55 69 91 91 90 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
22.9%
Poor
|
||||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
18GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 88 95 98 98 MB/s
|
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
243GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 75 89 97 89 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST3000DM001-1ER1 3TB
604GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 32 37 37 46 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 14x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 3x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $624 |