| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
| System | Asus N53SN (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK N53SN |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120110 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '20 at 16:06 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
| CPU Throttled | 70% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.3%
Below average
|
29% 40.3 Pts
|
11% 85.8 Pts
|
6% 105 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1712) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
|
1.05%
Terrible
|
1% 1.3 fps
|
1% 1.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 84 58 90 92 90 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
60% 82.1 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173CB0-CK0 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
32.2%
Below average
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
12% 4.23 GB/s
|
30% 133 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N53SN Builds (Compare 175 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus N53SN
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 119x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 30x |
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 120x |
| GeForce GT 550MNvidiaBench 4%, 926 samples | 48x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $299 |