| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A1 |
| Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130320 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 28 '20 at 21:03 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | SRB-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
75.7%
Very good
|
71% 122 Pts
|
59% 493 Pts
|
52% 838 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 350.12
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
12% 16.1 fps
|
14% 17.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 105 76 78 81 80 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
59% 80.2 MB/s
|
165% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 4x4GB
4 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.2%
Above average
|
55% 19.4 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
58% 68.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |