Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '20 at 22:11
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 211 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 612 61% 498 Pts	64-Core 629 39% 629 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AE) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.70 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Lighting 72 Reflection 74.8 Parallax 63.8 59% 70.2 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 71.3 57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 147 150 117 97 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 289 Write 259 Mixed 253 SusWrite 139 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 40.2 149% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 96.7 107% 178 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 85%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 849GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 106 151 202 26 94 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 428 Write 347 Mixed 294 SusWrite 119 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 8.5 50% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 17.5 34% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 611GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 113 112 115 115 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 98.7 Write 100 Mixed 46 SusWrite 112 65% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 88 88 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 141 Write 128 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 88.9 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 829GB free, PID 022e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 85 86 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 83.2 Write 83 Mixed 39 SusWrite 84.8 97% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 598GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 93.8 Write 95 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 99.8 108% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 44%
WD My Passport 260D 5TB 716 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2.5TB free, PID 260d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 100 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 94.5 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 99.1 122% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.7 259% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 89GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 37 Write 22.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 21.4 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.4 180% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-066.A00G 2x16GB 758 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 21.2 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	6,709x
Core i5-6600KIntel $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	3,716x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1,061x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2,195x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1,391x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,265x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	899x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	798x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	326x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	822x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	574x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	563x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $891

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16