HP CQ1-3117LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP CQ1-3117LA  (all builds)
MotherboardTPV-INVENTA 2AC6
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 x 65536 colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 02:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 39
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 30.5
21% 29.7 Pts
4-Core 30
8-Core 26.3
4% 28.1 Pts
64-Core 36.1
2% 36.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 70 76 65 64 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 81.5
Write 74.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 64.5
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.2
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ1-3117LA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP CQ1-3117LA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback