Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	8.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150811
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '20 at 21:59
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 177 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 196 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 43.1 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 37.3 35% 36.7 fps	Gravity 40.5 Splatting 35.9 34% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 59 94 115 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.8% Terrible	Read 26 Write 27.3 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 71.7 9% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 2.6 11% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 8.8% Great: 69%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 624GB free Firmware: JA0OA7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 46 80 81 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 21.2 Write 23.3 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 53.8 22% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 57%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179 751 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 372GB free Firmware: 3.AEG SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 48 74 72 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 26.8 Write 28 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 52.1 24% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-455.A00LF 1x8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	447x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	337x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	123x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	235x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	144x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	118x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	77x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	51x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	41x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	53x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16