Asus DSBF-D16/SAS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus DSBF-D16/SAS (all builds)
Memory	22 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '17 at 16:45
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5405 294 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 28.3 2-Core 56.5 33% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 200 19% 157 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 469 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 52 (AA) Unknown 100 100 4576 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 15 (AE) Unknown 99 99 35 (B7) Unknown 99 99 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 51 27 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	46.2% Average	Read 203 Write 200 Mixed 205 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 17.3 79% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 68.4 DQ Mixed 20.5 24% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 436GB free Firmware: JC45 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 127 Write 116 Mixed 111 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.65 137% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 70%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 500GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 434GB free Firmware: 3000 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 186 Write 101 Mixed 127 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 0.49 4K Mixed 0.37 91% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 300GB free Firmware: KC45 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 104 Write 44.5 Mixed 67.7 54% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.75 121% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 88%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 292GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 272GB free Firmware: 3000 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 233 Write 233 Mixed 179 161% 215 MB/s	4K Read 1.57 4K Write 5.23 4K Mixed 1.42 320% 2.74 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus DSBF-D16/SAS

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)