Asrock X99 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS  (all builds)
Memory53.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime67.8 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 02:34
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 653
61% 510 Pts
64-Core 1145
71% 1145 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 358.91
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 49.4
30% 41.7 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 27.6
29% 37 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
931GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 506
Write 402
Mixed 422
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 22.8
83% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 104
108% 179 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
679GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 506
Write 404
Mixed 423
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 23.3
83% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 94.5
106% 180 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZHPU512HCGL-00004 512GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 87%
WDC WD10 JPVT-00A1YT0 1TB
510GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 80.4
120% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.19
92% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 96GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 42.1
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $505
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback