Lenovo 4173PE4

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 4173PE4 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 4173PE4
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111129
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '17 at 12:14
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 92 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 155 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 217 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D3) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 2%
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D3) 1GB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.62 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 3.26 2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7WD240HAFV-000 240GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 71GB free Firmware: DXM8 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1042 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 171 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 5248 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 56 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1635471320	62.1% Good	Read 265 Write 238 Mixed 252 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 30.2 89% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 127 114% 172 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 92%
Msft Virtual Disk 34GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55% Above average	Read 264 Write 204 Mixed 223 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 25.4 77% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 100 94% 147 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS721010A9E6300 1TB 1,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 532GB free Firmware: JB0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 130 130 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1371 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3163 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1090 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1245246 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 58276 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 193274445854 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	56% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 95.4 Mixed 90.9 72% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.17 64% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 75%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 16GB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 5GB free Firmware: 01 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 11 Mixed 21.6 18% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.32 71% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 2,824 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 19.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 4173PE4

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)