Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory61.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 182
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 748
69% 579 Pts
64-Core 2,546
158% 2,546 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1117) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 3.44
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB800G4 640GB
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D2010355
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 413 402 400 404 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 329
Write 410
Mixed 317
SusWrite 404
83% 365 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 36.8
132% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 263
200% 271 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback