Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	9.98% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$15 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 50.9 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 51.7 29% 42.9 Pts	4-Core 52.8 8-Core 51.2 7% 52 Pts	64-Core 32.1 2% 32.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 67 44 51 63 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.98% Terrible	Read 58 Write 55 Mixed 62.6 SusWrite 59.7 13% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 4 13% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 73%
Corsair Voyager 3.0 253GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 77GB free, PID 1a03, Corsair Flash Voyager CMFVY3A-256GB Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 20 13 13 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 6.3 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 14.8 15% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	80x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	68x
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	57x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	54x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	40x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	35x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16