HP h8-1070t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1070t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110706
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 472
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA3GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 57 47 56 47 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 58
Write 91.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 50.9
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
59GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 98 101 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 71.9
Write 72.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 96.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
458GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 131 130 124 133 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 93.1
Write 64.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 120
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 96%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 32.2
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 2.3
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 62%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 32
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 1.6
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 62%
HGST HDN 726060ALE610 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 24 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 23.7
35% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1070t Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1070t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $321
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback