HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	13.8 GB free of 26 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 22:11
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 168 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 304 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 8C94) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.7% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 73.8 Parallax 64.4 57% 69.4 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 67 Splatting 68.5 56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV01H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 192 206 211 195 208 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.6% Good	Read 236 Write 216 Mixed 208 SusWrite 196 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 32.5 107% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 122%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 30GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 45 44 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	25% Poor	Read 43 Write 34.6 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 43.9 27% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 45%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 652GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 20.2 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 25 17% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 105%
WD Elements SE 2623 2TB 1,337 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free, PID 2623 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 26 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 25.2 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 26.7 36% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 99U5471-030.A00LF RMR1810EC58E8F1333 26GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	135x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	93x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	57x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	25x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	25x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	10x
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GBHynixBench 46%, 25 samples	8x
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 47%, 1,090 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16