Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '17 at 10:40
Run Duration	99 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6420K APU 788 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 77 1-Core 73 2-Core 112 55% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 112 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 20.3 19% 20.1 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 17 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 39807815 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 52003464021296 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 489 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 225 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 42 47247392801 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 47247392801 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 39807815 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 39807815 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 39807815 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1040 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1136 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1136 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1150	42.3% Average	Read 163 Write 92.5 Mixed 101 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 11.4 91% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 82.7 DQ Write 95 DQ Mixed 23.1 36% 67 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.1% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.67 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	8x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	6x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	2x

RAM
Team-Elite-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 70 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16