| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131126 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 17 '17 at 19:25 |
| Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 70% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.6%
Average
|
44% 64.2 Pts
|
13% 100 Pts
|
8% 123 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.5%
Poor
|
22% 24.8 fps
|
27% 33.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.3%
Poor
|
36% 164 MB/s
|
25% 10.3 MB/s
|
13% 24.3 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
90%
Excellent
|
85% 117 MB/s
|
65% 0.72 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-036.A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
10% 3.67 GB/s
|
45% 88.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 26x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 24x |
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples | 12x |
| Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 11x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $226 |