Asus P5N-T DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus P5N-T DELUXE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5N-T DELUXE
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 07:31
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 76.8
44% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 147
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1117) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.44
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 126 158 172 172 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 188
Mixed 28
SusWrite 157
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
348% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
308GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 81 84 85 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 86.8
Write 91.8
Mixed 51
SusWrite 83.5
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
101GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 159 159 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 147
Write 144
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 158
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 34.3
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 30
43% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
422GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.9 3.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 32.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 4.1
31% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 4
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-T DELUXE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P5N-T DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback