Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 39.9 1-Core 11 2-Core 28.4 19% 26.4 Pts	4-Core 25.1 8-Core 28.9 4% 27 Pts	64-Core 26.5 2% 26.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 99 98 94 109 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 147 Write 92.7 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 98.7 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 5.5 22% 7.13 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 23.3 DQ Mixed 16.9 14% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 1x2GB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.43% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
C-60 APUAMDBench 23%, 2,297 samples	4x
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	3x

SSD
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	1x
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	1x
S3 SSD 128GBVi550Bench 70%, 781 samples	1x

RAM
SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 1x4GBSmartBench 28%, 751 samples	2x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 26%, 6,848 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16