Terrans T5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTerrans T5  (all builds)
MotherboardTerrans T5
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150305
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 16:59
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 178
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 533
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6555) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 42
Parallax 7.09
3% 17.7 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.17
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Terrans Force 128G SSD 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 206 213 184 198 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 438
Write 208
Mixed 238
SusWrite 199
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 26.7
97% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 177
151% 222 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 92%
Plextor PX-256M6G-2280 256GB
182GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 349 370 364 355 374 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 416
Write 370
Mixed 258
SusWrite 364
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 21.1
90% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 225
195% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 92.5
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 126
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
196% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.C8F Samsung M471B1G73CB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical T5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Terrans T5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback