Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '17 at 06:07
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 79 1-Core 119 2-Core 238 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 947 84% 712 Pts	64-Core 1,276 79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 79.8 54% 68.5 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 53.3 Splatting 75.3 52% 62.5 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB 2,469 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 79 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 146 (A5) Unknown 100 100 19661035 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 217 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 92 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 58 249109676077 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 287763726403 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 250 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1134 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1098 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1236 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	79.2% Very good	Read 497 Write 234 Mixed 400 83% 377 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 16 116% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 17.3 82% 184 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 98%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 86 (03) Spinup time 186 180 5691 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 945 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5380 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 46 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3465 (C2) HDA temperature 117 88 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	85.2% Excellent	Read 145 Write 152 Mixed 144 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.21 109% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 83%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 417GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 9587 (03) Spinup time 153 142 5341 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1903 (05) Reallocated sector count 173 173 211 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2204 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1856 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1046 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1900 (C2) HDA temperature 106 96 41 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 279 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 189 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 194 0	54.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 89.2 Mixed 90.8 70% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.37 115% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545025A7E380 250GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 63GB free Firmware: GGEOA7A0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 214 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2232 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3932 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1927 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 132 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 123574 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 197569609762 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	31.1% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 51.6 Mixed 54.3 41% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.18 62% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 4x4GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 35.2 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 28.8 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $852

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)