Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '20 at 14:03
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 156 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 365 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 5 4% 5.3 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 259 258 258 258 258 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 39GB free Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 132 130 94 77 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.9% Below average	Read 199 Write 137 Mixed 151 SusWrite 117 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 13 55% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 47.2 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 40 32% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 85%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 59GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 29.2 Write 14 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 21.8 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.1 238% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 44GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16