Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200520
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 127
55% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 333
34% 278 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 50.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 21.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 9.3 5.3 61 54 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,119
Write 824
Mixed 705
SusWrite 51.7
150% 675 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 45
152% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 335
263% 359 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 112%
Great: 209%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
110GB free
Firmware: SM14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 79.5
Write 82.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 84.9
48% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.5
302% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 65%
USB Disk 0GB
0GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback