Lenovo 20EQS65700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS65700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS65700
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 10:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 172
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 486
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8281
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 6.6
4% 9.53 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TN8U256G1001 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 416
Write 203
Mixed 248
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 27.5
95% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 204
170% 248 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
110GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.5
Write 45.7
Mixed 57
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.9% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback